On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Consider the 2 for loops given below.
>
> for (i = 0; i < N ; i++)
> {
> a[i]= 1;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < N ; i++)
> {
> j = j+a[i];
> }
>
> The headers of these 2 loops are bb_3, bb_
Hi,
Consider the 2 for loops given below.
for (i = 0; i < N ; i++)
{
a[i]= 1;
}
for (i = 0; i < N ; i++)
{
j = j+a[i];
}
The headers of these 2 loops are bb_3, bb_6 respectively. They are as follows.
bb_3 (preds = {bb_4 bb_2 }, succs = {bb_4 bb_5 })
{
:
# a_
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Richard Guenther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Richard Guenther
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Sa
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Richard Guenther
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Berlin <
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Richard Guenther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/15/08 1:34 PM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > > To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have
> updated
> > > > > SSA information" is false.
> > > > > If you had updated the S
On 4/15/08 1:34 PM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
Hi,
> To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have updated
> SSA information" is false.
> If you had updated the SSA information, the error would not occur :).
>
> How exactly are you updating the ssa information?
>
> The general w
Hi,
> > > To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have updated
> > > SSA information" is false.
> > > If you had updated the SSA information, the error would not occur :).
> > >
> > > How exactly are you updating the ssa information?
> > >
> > > The general way to update SSA
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have updated
> > SSA information" is false.
> > If you had updated the SSA information, the error would not occur :).
> >
> > How exactly are you upda
Hi,
> To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have updated
> SSA information" is false.
> If you had updated the SSA information, the error would not occur :).
>
> How exactly are you updating the ssa information?
>
> The general way to update SSA for this case would be:
>
> For
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have updated
> > SSA information" is false.
> > If you had updated the SSA informat
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have updated
> SSA information" is false.
> If you had updated the SSA information, the error would not occur :).
>
> How exactly are you updating the ssa informat
To clarify what Richard means, your assertion that "you have updated
SSA information" is false.
If you had updated the SSA information, the error would not occur :).
How exactly are you updating the ssa information?
The general way to update SSA for this case would be:
For each statement you hav
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have transferred all the statements of one BB( header of one loop)
> to another BB. After that I have updated SSA information too.
> But I get this error-
>
> definition in block 6 does not dominate use in b
Hi,
I have transferred all the statements of one BB( header of one loop)
to another BB. After that I have updated SSA information too.
But I get this error-
definition in block 6 does not dominate use in block 3
for SSA_NAME: i_25 in statement:
# VUSE
D.1189_10 = a[i_25];
loop.c:8: internal com
15 matches
Mail list logo
