Thanks Joe.
Piyush Garyali
--
My Blog http://verypondycherry.blogspot.com
On 3/25/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:15:58PM +0530, Piyush Garyali wrote:
> > Is there any solution to fix the troubles which result from the change
> > to the name mangling algorith
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:15:58PM +0530, Piyush Garyali wrote:
> Is there any solution to fix the troubles which result from the change
> to the name mangling algorithm between 3.2 and 2.95 ?
The troubles do not result from the name mangling algorithm. If anything,
the incompatible name mangling
On Mar 24, 2006, at 1:49 AM, Piyush Garyali wrote:
I meant other than recompiling the code of course. I have some
binaries without the source code. does 3.2 support the old mangling
algorithm.
Sure, just re-implement the 2.95 abi in 3.2 if you think that is
better than re-implementing code th
I meant other than recompiling the code of course. I have some
binaries without the source code. does 3.2 support the old mangling
algorithm.
thanks
Piyush
--
My blog http://verypondycherry.blogspot.com
On 3/24/06, Piyush Garyali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any solution to fix the trou
Is there any solution to fix the troubles which result from the change
to the name mangling algorithm between 3.2 and 2.95 ?
thanks
Piyush
--
My blog http://verypondycherry.blogspot.com
