Simon Wright writes:
> The Mercurial mirror at http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc was last updated 11 months
> ago at SVN r166522.
>
> I think it can only cause confusion to have the mirror live but stale; ought
> it to be turned off?
Agreed. Besides, nowadays you don't need a
The Mercurial mirror at http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc was last updated 11 months
ago at SVN r166522.
I think it can only cause confusion to have the mirror live but stale; ought it
to be turned off?
The Mercurial mirror at http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc was last updated 11 months
ago at SVN r166522.
I think it can only cause confusion to have the mirror live but stale; ought it
to be turned off?
In data giovedì 01 aprile 2010 21:13:20, Frank Ch. Eigler ha scritto:
> Or rather, it has gotten stale. I started up update process that
> should, very very slowly, let it catch up with the present day. If
> that completes in reasonable time, maybe I'll keep it running.
Ok, it's been several da
In data giovedì 01 aprile 2010 21:13:20, Frank Ch. Eigler ha scritto:
> > The mercurial mirror of the gcc repository, at
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc has been broken [...]
>
> Or rather, it has gotten stale. I started up update process that
> should, very very slowly, let
Thomas Capricelli writes:
> The mercurial mirror of the gcc repository, at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc has been broken [...]
Or rather, it has gotten stale. I started up update process that
should, very very slowly, let it catch up with the present day. If
that completes in reasonabl
In data giovedì 01 aprile 2010 16:29:12, Rainer Orth ha scritto:
> works just fine. From my experience, hg is vastly superior to git,
> which is simply a usability nightmare, as Dan Berlin discovered when he
> worked on setting up the hg mirror.
I completely agree, but my point was not to start
Thomas Capricelli writes:
> The mercurial mirror of the gcc repository, at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc has been broken for months. and the
> contact listed there does not answer emails.
>
> Can somebody here at least remove those misleading pages..?
If there is concensus
Thomas,
> The mercurial mirror of the gcc repository, at http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc has
> been broken for months. and the contact listed there does not answer
> emails.
unfortunately true, I've asked the same question quite some time ago.
> Can somebody here at l
Hello,
The mercurial mirror of the gcc repository, at http://gcc.gnu.org/hg/gcc has
been broken for months. and the contact listed there does not answer emails.
Can somebody here at least remove those misleading pages..?
Also, i would volunteer to fix this, and even to maintain the mirror
I've just found (when I wanted to run a reghunt, which is way faster
with hg than with svn) that the mercurial mirror of svn mainline hasn't
been updated since September 10th. Is there any chance that this mirror
can be revived?
Thanks.
Should be fixed now
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The mirroring job started failing, i'm working on it.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Schlüter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Mercurial repository has no
The mirroring job started failing, i'm working on it.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Schlüter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the Mercurial repository has not been updated since svn revision 133268
> which happened yesterday morning GMT. With all this talk about git
> recentl
Hi,
the Mercurial repository has not been updated since svn revision 133268
which happened yesterday morning GMT. With all this talk about git
recently, I'm wondering if the Mercurial repository is still alive?
Cheers,
- Tobi
14 matches
Mail list logo
