On 28/09/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, I still don't see where is the problem. You either want the
> extension in your branch, so you merge it and simply update libstdc++,
> or you don't want the extension just yet, so you just don't update
> libstdc++ (or update back
>
>
> Sorry, I still don't see where is the problem. You either want the
> extension in your branch, so you merge it and simply update libstdc++,
> or you don't want the extension just yet, so you just don't update
> libstdc++ (or update back to your previous revision).
That means you have to fol
On 27/09/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 17:38:
> >
> > > Why? Perhaps I am entirely wrong but can't you just don't update (svn
> > > up) those directories that are switched until main
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 18:50:
> On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 18:25:
>>> On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
If a pristine directory needs changes from the directory I branched, I'm
in
On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 18:25:
> On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If a pristine directory needs changes from the directory I branched, I'm
>> in trouble.
>>
>
> Why? Sorry, I think I don't understand wha
> Why? Perhaps I am entirely wrong but can't you just don't update (svn
> up) those directories that are switched until mainline is in an usable
> state?
That's only feasible if you're the only person working on that branch, and you
only ever use one checkout on one machine.
I guess you could us
>
> On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 17:38:
> >
> > > Why? Perhaps I am entirely wrong but can't you just don't update (svn
> > > up) those directories that are switched until mainline is in an usable
> > > state?
> > >
> > If a pri
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 18:25:
> On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If a pristine directory needs changes from the directory I branched, I'm
>> in trouble.
>>
>
> Why? Sorry, I think I don't understand what you mean.
>
Say I branch gcc/gcc and keep all the run
On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 17:38:
> Why? Perhaps I am entirely wrong but can't you just don't update (svn
> up) those directories that are switched until mainline is in an usable
> state?
>
If a pristine directory needs changes fro
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 17:38:
> Why? Perhaps I am entirely wrong but can't you just don't update (svn
> up) those directories that are switched until mainline is in an usable
> state?
>
If a pristine directory needs changes from the directory I branched, I'm
in trouble.
On 27/09/06, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote on 09/27/06 16:37:
>
> > If you are just writing a new pass, you can probably get away with
> > branching only a few files, and switching those may be a lot better
> >
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 21:37, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I see occasional complaints about the size of mainline merges to
> branches Most people working on branches are only modifying a very
> small subset of the files that are in mainline, and certainly not the
> entire trunk tree.
I'm kinda
On 9/27/06, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Berlin wrote on 09/27/06 16:37:
> If you are just writing a new pass, you can probably get away with
> branching only a few files, and switching those may be a lot better
> strategy than branching the entire trunk tree branch to modify
Daniel Berlin wrote on 09/27/06 16:37:
> If you are just writing a new pass, you can probably get away with
> branching only a few files, and switching those may be a lot better
> strategy than branching the entire trunk tree branch to modify 6 files
> in the gcc dir.
>
But this means that I'm at
I see occasional complaints about the size of mainline merges to
branches Most people working on branches are only modifying a very
small subset of the files that are in mainline, and certainly not the
entire trunk tree.
You guys should be aware that you can simply branch those files you
want (o
15 matches
Mail list logo
