> Hey Paolo thanx a lot.I got the info I required.
> Can u mention any links that i can use as a reference to understand the dump
> output of -fdump-tree-original-raw as AST?
read
GENERIC and GIMPLE: A new tree representation for entire functions
at
http://zenii.linux.org.uk/~ajh/gcc/gccsu
Hey Paolo thanx a lot.I got the info I required.
Can u mention any links that i can use as a reference to understand the dump
output of -fdump-tree-original-raw as AST?
Thanx a lot.
Darthrader
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Machine-Dependance-t1047440.html
Sorry if I am more terse this time. Also, these questions are now more
suited for the gcc-help list, rather than this one which is for
development of GCC itself.
# 1 "test.c"
# 1 " "
# 1 " "
# 1 "test.c"
What do these represent?
Try "info cpp", and search for "Preprocessor Output".
Kindl
to RTL and to strict
> RTL, more and more machine dependent pieces creep into its intermediate
> representation. In the end, things are so machine dependent that most
> non-trivial changes to the RTL middle-end had better be tested on more
> than one machine: they can work like a charm on i686 and break, say,
> powerpc or arm or s390 or all of these.
>
> Paolo
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Machine-Dependance-t1047440.html#a2725013
Sent from the gcc - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
Darthrader (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Is the AST[Abstract Syntax Tree] machine dependent?
The nodes that are generated for the program as it is parsed are machine
independent. However:
1) this can only be true if your source code is already preprocessed.
Otherwise, the source code that GC
,why ?
Also what does algn : mean?
Darthrader
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Machine-Dependance-t1047440.html#a2722136
Sent from the gcc - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
