Hi Steve,
PR 51751 seems to concern only complex*16 failures. Have
you had a chance to look at the real and double precision
errors?
That PR is in a different category, because input values to a BLAS
routine are wrong. I suspect an error in the testing (relying
on uninitialized memory), but
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:34:41PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have set up a semi-automatic lapack tester on
> powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc110 on the gcc compile farm).
> It downloads the current trunk, compiles it, then uses that
> compiler to compile the
Hello,
I have set up a semi-automatic lapack tester on
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc110 on the gcc compile farm).
It downloads the current trunk, compiles it, then uses that
compiler to compile the reference BLAS and Lapack and run the LAPACK
test suite, cycling through the Lapack build with
