On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> > WPA re-streams packed function bodies as-is, so anything referred to
> > from within just the body won't be subject to mode remapping; I think
> > only modes of toplevel declarations and functions' arguments will be
> > remapped. And I believe it woul
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> > In general I think they should match. But without seeing concrete
> > examples of where they do not I can't comment on whether such exceptions
> > make sense. For example if you adjust a DECLs alignme
Hi
In general I think they should match. But without seeing concrete
examples of where they do not I can't comment on whether such
exceptions
make sense. For example if you adjust a DECLs alignment and then
re-layout it I'd expect you might get a non-BLKmode mode for an
aggregate in some cir
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> In general I think they should match. But without seeing concrete
> examples of where they do not I can't comment on whether such exceptions
> make sense. For example if you adjust a DECLs alignment and then
> re-layout it I'd expect you might get a n
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> > My suggestion at that time isn't likely working in practice due to the
> > limitations Jakub outlines below. The situation is a bit unfortunate
> > but expect to run into more host(!) dependences in the L
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> My suggestion at that time isn't likely working in practice due to the
> limitations Jakub outlines below. The situation is a bit unfortunate
> but expect to run into more host(!) dependences in the LTO bytecode.
> Yes, while it would be nice to LTO x86_
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:49:55PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > If the host has long double the same as double, sure, PTX can use its
> > > native
> > > DFmode even for long double. But otherwise, th
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 08:40:11PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > Hello, Richard, Jakub, community,
> >
> > May I join/restart the old discussion about machine mode remapping at LTO
> > stream-in time. To recap, when offloading to NVPTX was introdu
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:38:54PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:49:55PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > If the host has long double the same as double, sure, PTX can u
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:49:55PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > If the host has long double the same as double, sure, PTX can use its
> > > native
> > > DFmode even for long double. But otherwise, the
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:49:55PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > If the host has long double the same as double, sure, PTX can use its native
> > DFmode even for long double. But otherwise, the storage must be
> > transferable between accelerator an
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> If the host has long double the same as double, sure, PTX can use its native
> DFmode even for long double. But otherwise, the storage must be
> transferable between accelerator and host.
Hm, sorry, the 'must' is not obvious to me: is it known that the O
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 06:38:28PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> I wonder if it's possible to have a small tag in tree types to distinguish
> between binary/decimal/fixed-point types. For prototyping, I was thinking
> about just looking at the type name, because non-ieee-binary types have an
>
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> In my view mode is essential part of the type system. It (sadly, but still)
> participates in many ABI decisions, but more importantly especially for
> floating point types it is the main source of information of what the type
> actually is, as just size
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 08:40:11PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> Hello, Richard, Jakub, community,
>
> May I join/restart the old discussion about machine mode remapping at LTO
> stream-in time. To recap, when offloading to NVPTX was introduced, there
> was a problem due to differences in the
Hello, Richard, Jakub, community,
May I join/restart the old discussion about machine mode remapping at LTO
stream-in time. To recap, when offloading to NVPTX was introduced, there
was a problem due to differences in the set of supported modes (e.g. there
was no 'XFmode' on NVPTX that would corre
16 matches
Mail list logo
