On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 11:02 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, this posting has a bit more detail on the actual implementation...
>>>
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/0
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 11:02 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> FYI, this posting has a bit more detail on the actual implementation...
>>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092438.html
>
>
> That surely helps - thanks.
Basically NVIDI
On 11/16/2015 11:02 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
FYI, this posting has a bit more detail on the actual implementation...
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092438.html
That surely helps - thanks.
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 37
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 10:33 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Of course one unknown is whether PGI had already done any work
>> internally with the llvm middle-/back-end. If so, they might not be
>> starting from scratch.
>
>
> Perhaps it helps if I repost t
On 11/16/2015 10:33 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Of course one unknown is whether PGI had already done any work
internally with the llvm middle-/back-end. If so, they might not be
starting from scratch.
Perhaps it helps if I repost the following from 12 years ago:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/20
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 10:11 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>
>>> To put this in a (timeline) perspective:
>>>
>>> On the 18th of March, 2000, I announced Andy Vaught's work on the g95
>>> front-end to
On 11/16/2015 10:11 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
To put this in a (timeline) perspective:
On the 18th of March, 2000, I announced Andy Vaught's work on the g95
front-end to the gcc-patches mailing list.
In 2004 (!) we merged the resulting compi
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 12:58 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:04:06AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
>
>>> See
>>>
>>>
>>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/11/llvm-to-get-fortran-compiler-that-targets-parallel-gpus-
On 11/16/2015 12:58 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:04:06AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
See
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/11/llvm-to-get-fortran-compiler-that-targets-parallel-gpus-in-clusters/
It is not entirely clear on what they plan to do.
Use gfo
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:04:06AM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> See
>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/11/llvm-to-get-fortran-compiler-that-targets-parallel-gpus-in-clusters/
>
> It is not entirely clear on what they plan to do.
>
> Use gfortran via dragonegg?
>
The 3 DOE
See
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/11/llvm-to-get-fortran-compiler-that-targets-parallel-gpus-in-clusters/
It is not entirely clear on what they plan to do.
Use gfortran via dragonegg?
Regards
Thomas
11 matches
Mail list logo