On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Arnaldo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Arnaldo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
> I couldn't get cfge
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Arnaldo wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
>>>
I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
(basic
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Arnaldo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
>>
>>> I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
>>> (basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly because there is some
>
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Arnaldo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
>>
>>> I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
>>> (basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly because there is some
>
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
>
>> I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
>> (basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly because there is some
>> preprocessing in gimple_expand_cfg() that has to be do
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
> I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
> (basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly because there is some
> preprocessing in gimple_expand_cfg() that has to be done first. But
> calling gimple_expand_cfg() modifies the CF
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Arnaldo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Arnaldo wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 02/17/2012 08:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:17 -0400, Arnaldo wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>>>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Arnaldo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 02/17/2012 08:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:17 -0400, Arnaldo wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm working on an extension to the Graphite pass
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 08:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:17 -0400, Arnaldo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm working on an extension to the Graphite pass of GCC 4.4.0. My
>>> intention is to associate costs to R
On 02/17/2012 08:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:17 -0400, Arnaldo wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm working on an extension to the Graphite pass of GCC 4.4.0. My
intention is to associate costs to RTL instructions by adding them as
RTX attributes to a machine description file, a
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:17 -0400, Arnaldo wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm working on an extension to the Graphite pass of GCC 4.4.0. My
> intention is to associate costs to RTL instructions by adding them as
> RTX attributes to a machine description file, and to read them back
> during the Grap
Hello everyone,
I'm working on an extension to the Graphite pass of GCC 4.4.0. My
intention is to associate costs to RTL instructions by adding them as
RTX attributes to a machine description file, and to read them back
during the Graphite pass by iterating through each basic block.
Is the RTL a
12 matches
Mail list logo