On 2/21/24 10:43, Michael Matz wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Daniil Frolov wrote:
Following the recent introduction of more detailed CLOBBER types in GCC, a
minor inconsistency has been identified in the description of
CLOBBER_OBJECT_BEGIN:
/* Beginning of object lifetime, e.g. C++ co
Hello,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, Daniil Frolov wrote:
> >> Following the recent introduction of more detailed CLOBBER types in GCC, a
> >> minor
> >> inconsistency has been identified in the description of
> >> CLOBBER_OBJECT_BEGIN:
> >>
> >> /* Beginning of object lifetime, e.g. C++ constructor.
On 2024-02-21 15:33, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 03:02:55PM +0400, Daniil Frolov wrote:
Hi.
Following the recent introduction of more detailed CLOBBER types in
GCC, a
minor
inconsistency has been identified in the description of
CLOBBER_OBJECT_BEGIN:
/* Beginning of obje
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 03:02:55PM +0400, Daniil Frolov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following the recent introduction of more detailed CLOBBER types in GCC, a
> minor
> inconsistency has been identified in the description of
> CLOBBER_OBJECT_BEGIN:
>
> /* Beginning of object lifetime, e.g. C++ constructor
Hi.
Following the recent introduction of more detailed CLOBBER types in GCC,
a minor
inconsistency has been identified in the description of
CLOBBER_OBJECT_BEGIN:
/* Beginning of object lifetime, e.g. C++ constructor. */
CLOBBER_OBJECT_BEGIN
This comment appears somewhat contradictory,
