FX wrote:
Here is my report on Fortran benchmarking. I compare the trunk dated
20080507 (no revision number, sorry) and the IRA branch rev. 135035. I
run the Polyhedron benchmark
(http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/polyhedron_benchmark_suite0html) which is
probably the most widely used benchmark in the
David Edelsohn wrote:
FX writes:
FX> The performance regression is mainly due to one testcase, induct,
FX> which is taking a 30% hit on IRA. If the performance of that one were
FX> the same with IRA than with the old allocator, the switch would be
FX> (for this benchmark) performa
> FX writes:
FX> The performance regression is mainly due to one testcase, induct,
FX> which is taking a 30% hit on IRA. If the performance of that one were
FX> the same with IRA than with the old allocator, the switch would be
FX> (for this benchmark) performance-neutral. So, I have investig
Here is my report on Fortran benchmarking. I compare the trunk dated
20080507 (no revision number, sorry) and the IRA branch rev. 135035. I
run the Polyhedron benchmark
(http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/polyhedron_benchmark_suite0html) which is
probably the most widely used benchmark in the Fortran comm
