Sorry if I misunderstood, but...
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> 2009/12/18 Hans-Peter Nilsson :
> > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> >> I tried implementing the suggestion given by Richard, but got into
> >> issues. The GCC frame work is written assuming that there are no
2009/12/18 Hans-Peter Nilsson :
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
>> I tried implementing the suggestion given by Richard, but got into
>> issues. The GCC frame work is written assuming that there are no modes
>> with HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT < GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) < 2 *
>> HOST_BITS_PER
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> I tried implementing the suggestion given by Richard, but got into
> issues. The GCC frame work is written assuming that there are no modes
> with HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT < GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) < 2 *
> HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT.
(Not seeing a reply regard
Hello all,
I am porting GCC 4.4.0 for a 32bit target. The target has 40bit data
registers and 32bit address register. Both can be used as general
purpose registers. All load and store operations are 32bit. If 40bit
data register is involved in load/sore the register gets sign
extended. Whenever th
