PING^1
On 07/18/2018 03:49 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 02:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2018 03:45 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> For purpose of --coverage I w
On 07/18/2018 02:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 07/18/2018 03:45 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda functions
among DECL_
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 03:45 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda functions
>>> among DECL_ARTIFICIAL functions.
>>
>> I'm curious, why?
>
> I
On 07/18/2018 03:45 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda functions
>> among DECL_ARTIFICIAL functions.
>
> I'm curious, why?
>
> Jason
>
It's important for GCOV to report coverage for fun
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda functions
> among DECL_ARTIFICIAL functions.
I'm curious, why?
Jason
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 07/16/2018 06:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > On 07/16/2018 12:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >> Just use a spare bit in function_decl, then we can simply stream it.
> >
> > If there's one, then sure. (you've reminded me that there a
On 07/16/2018 06:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 12:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> Just use a spare bit in function_decl, then we can simply stream it.
>
> If there's one, then sure. (you've reminded me that there are a bunch of
> mutually disjoint flags in function_decl that co
On 07/16/2018 12:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Just use a spare bit in function_decl, then we can simply stream it.
If there's one, then sure. (you've reminded me that there are a bunch
of mutually disjoint flags in function_decl that could be collapsed to
an enumeration. This may be anothe
On July 16, 2018 4:30:42 PM GMT+02:00, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>On 07/16/2018 03:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda
>functions
>> among DECL_ARTIFICIAL functions. Currently, cp-tree.h provides macro:
>>
>> /* Test if FUNCTION_DECL i
On 07/16/2018 03:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda functions
among DECL_ARTIFICIAL functions. Currently, cp-tree.h provides macro:
/* Test if FUNCTION_DECL is a lambda function. */
#define LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P(FNDECL)
Hi.
For purpose of --coverage I would like to distinguish lambda functions
among DECL_ARTIFICIAL functions. Currently, cp-tree.h provides macro:
/* Test if FUNCTION_DECL is a lambda function. */
#define LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P(FNDECL) \
(DECL_DECLARES_FUNCTION_P (FNDECL
11 matches
Mail list logo