On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>
> They are complementary. The fold_ variants are for simplifications
> throughout tree passes while the expand_ variant translates
> builtin calls to target-specific RTL (with falling back to libcalls).
>
Thanks Richard, that's exactly w
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When handling builtin functions there's the fold_builtin and the
> expand_builtin that can be defined. They seem to do their work at
> different times but I am not exactly sure if they are alternatives or
> complementary.
>
> Can'
Hello,
When handling builtin functions there's the fold_builtin and the
expand_builtin that can be defined. They seem to do their work at
different times but I am not exactly sure if they are alternatives or
complementary.
Can't find anywhere explaining their use besides what's found in the
inter
