Dorit Nuzman wrote:
any chance you kept the dumps and can report which loops were not
vectorized/recognized with -ftree-loop-linear (so we could see if these
represent missed vectorization opportunities?)
I haven't, but it wouldn't be too much effort do this.
I'll try stage 1 tonight - i.e.,
> Sebastian,
>
> Here are (attached) results for testing HIRLAM with and without
> -ftree-loop-linear.
>
> As you can see, the results are neutral: 4 loops fewer vectorized, but
> about 50 fewer recognized.
>
any chance you kept the dumps and can report which loops were not
vectorized/recognized
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> I wrote:
rttov_aitosu.f90: In function 'rttov_aitosu':
rttov_aitosu.f90:4: error: definition in block 262 does not dominate use in
block 134
Worked around by compiling this file without -ftree-loop-linear
Could you verify that the attached patch fixes also this probl
On Dec 14, 2007 4:24 PM, Toon Moene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are (attached) results for testing HIRLAM with and without
> -ftree-loop-linear.
>
Thanks Toon for checking this.
> Compilation flags:
>
> CCFLAGS := -g -O3 $(MACHINECPP) -ftree-loop-linear -ffast-math
> -fno-associative-math
Sebastian,
Here are (attached) results for testing HIRLAM with and without
-ftree-loop-linear.
As you can see, the results are neutral: 4 loops fewer vectorized, but
about 50 fewer recognized.
Now I like to redo that test with -ftree-loop-distribution. Can you
send me a patch against the
