BTW,
has someone ported the binutils-2.13.2.1 libaddr2line patches to
binutils-2.16?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
> libaddr2line used to be a proprietary library distributed by AdaCore
> only.
This is wrong, libaddr2line never was proprietary. It can't be in any case,
since it's based on binutils.
> IIRC, libaddr2line never was suitable for tasking.
This is also wrong, GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic is suitable fo
> "Florian" == Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Florian> Java implementations needs to solve pretty much the same
Florian> problem. How is it done in GCJ?
When printing a stack trace we exec addr2line if it is available.
This is optional though, there is a system property you can s
* Andrew Haley:
> > Java implementations needs to solve pretty much the same problem. How
> > is it done in GCJ?
>
> Every Java class has full reflection data for all of its methods.
> Given the address of a method, therefore, it's a straightforward
> reverse lookup to get the name.
It seems t
libaddr2line used to be a proprietary library distributed by AdaCore
only. (I'm not sure if it was intentionally proprietary.)
As far as I know, it's just the binutils addr2line with a tiny patch/wrapper.
Certainly covered the by GPL, not proprietary.
Florian Weimer writes:
> * David Gressett:
>
> > It does work with the GNAT GPL 2005 that I have on my XP box at home. A
> > search of the gcc mailing list archive didn't turn up much, but there
> > was one message which indicated that there was a license problem with
> > the addr2line so
* David Gressett:
> It does work with the GNAT GPL 2005 that I have on my XP box at home. A
> search of the gcc mailing list archive didn't turn up much, but there
> was one message which indicated that there was a license problem with
> the addr2line source code that the Ada Core people were
What is the status of GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic? I have gcc 4.0.1 20050727
(Red Hat 4.0.1-5) on my Fedora C4 system, and gcc 3.4.2 (mingw-special)
and gcc 3.4.5 on my Windows 2000 system. In all 3 of these, the source
code comments in g-trasym.ads indicate that symbolic traceback doesn't
work on
