Re: GIMPLE nodes to ASM by using builtins

2008-01-30 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Thomas A.M. Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When you mean scheduling of the instruction, does it mean that the > register allocation for ASM is not that advanced than it is for a > builtin ? For instance the use of register classes, for the > instruction. Register allocation for an asm us

Re: GIMPLE nodes to ASM by using builtins

2008-01-30 Thread Thomas A.M. Bernard
When you mean scheduling of the instruction, does it mean that the register allocation for ASM is not that advanced than it is for a builtin ? For instance the use of register classes, for the instruction. I basically would like to translate a gimple node which holds information about a featur

Re: GIMPLE nodes to ASM by using builtins

2008-01-30 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Thomas A.M. Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I generate a GIMPLE form extended with new nodes coming from language > extensions. I would like to generate assembly code directly from those > nodes. I was thinking of using the GCC builtins system. But I cannot > find the entry point (hook and

GIMPLE nodes to ASM by using builtins

2008-01-30 Thread Thomas A.M. Bernard
Hello I generate a GIMPLE form extended with new nodes coming from language extensions. I would like to generate assembly code directly from those nodes. I was thinking of using the GCC builtins system. But I cannot find the entry point (hook and file) within the files to do so. (GCC 4.1 vers