Re: GCC Binary

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 12:27 -0700, Erick Garske wrote: >> There a location where I can download the binary of GCC for the IBM i? >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html >> >> Are any of these compatible for the IBM i at V6R1M0? > > Ther

Re: GCC Binary

On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 12:27 -0700, Erick Garske wrote: > There a location where I can download the binary of GCC for the IBM i? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html > > Are any of these compatible for the IBM i at V6R1M0? There is no support in GCC for native iSeries (AKA AS/400). Pete

GCC Binary

There a location where I can download the binary of GCC for the IBM i? http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html Are any of these compatible for the IBM i at V6R1M0? Thanks, Erick

Re: gcc binary download

Tobias Burnus wrote: > > Otherwise, you could consider building GCC yourself, cf. > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/. (Furthermore, some gfortran developers > offer regular GCC builds, which are linked at > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries; those are all unofficial > builds, come without any w

Re: gcc binary download

Ben Elliston wrote: >> I cannot find where to download gcc binary for Linux. Can you email me >> the link? It's so confusing in the http://gcc.gnu.org/ web site. > > You should install gcc from your Linux distribution. It will be far > easier. To add: There are no b

Re: gcc binary download

> I cannot find where to download gcc binary for Linux. Can you email me > the link? It's so confusing in the http://gcc.gnu.org/ web site. You should install gcc from your Linux distribution. It will be far easier. Ben

gcc binary download

Hi, I cannot find where to download gcc binary for Linux. Can you email me the link? It's so confusing in the http://gcc.gnu.org/ web site. Thanks, simon

RE: gcc binary for fc1

On 26 May 2006 15:48, Dude VanWinkle wrote: > I am trying to compile the source for gcc, but do not yet have gcc. > > I am on a fc1 machine and have been googling for hours at the clients > site, trying to find out what I need and where to get it. > > can anyone help me in figuring out how to ge

gcc binary for fc1

I am trying to compile the source for gcc, but do not yet have gcc. I am on a fc1 machine and have been googling for hours at the clients site, trying to find out what I need and where to get it. can anyone help me in figuring out how to get a compiler onto a fc1 machine with _no_compiler? than

Re: gcc binary

Simon Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Where can I download gcc binary code for Linux? What's > URL? This is actually the wrong mailing list for this question. Can you tell us why you wrote to this list, so that we can encourage people to write to the correct list instead? T

Re: gcc binary

On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:15:20PM -0700, Simon Tsai wrote: > Where can I download gcc binary code for Linux? What's > URL? You're best off using the gcc package that is designed to work with your distribution. Please ask a list that is devoted to your GNU/Linux distribution to

gcc binary

Hi, Where can I download gcc binary code for Linux? What's URL? Thanks. simon __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations?

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 08:41:58AM -0700, Gary Funck wrote: > Yes, with recent versions of gcc you can move the entire tree around > and the gcc driver will still be able to find the various internal > executables and header files. [...] Ian, thanks. Which versions qualify

Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations?

"Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ian Lance Taylor wrote (in part): > > Telling the dynamic linker about a dynamic libgcc is still a problem, > > but that is a problem whereever you put the compiler. > > If I'm not interested in build a dynamically linked gcc, or building > libgcc and re

RE: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations?

Ian Lance Taylor wrote (in part): > Telling the dynamic linker about a dynamic libgcc is still a problem, > but that is a problem whereever you put the compiler. If I'm not interested in build a dynamically linked gcc, or building libgcc and related libraries as dynamic libraries, can I simply as

Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations?

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 08:41:58AM -0700, Gary Funck wrote: > > > > > Yes, with recent versions of gcc you can move the entire tree around > > and the gcc driver will still be able to find the various internal > > executables and header files. [...] > > Ian, thanks. > > Which versions qualify a

RE: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations?

> > Yes, with recent versions of gcc you can move the entire tree around > and the gcc driver will still be able to find the various internal > executables and header files. [...] Ian, thanks. Which versions qualify as "recent" above? GCC 3.4, or 4.0, or both? Is there any documentation on how

Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations?

"Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Given a binary distibution of GCC, for example, built to install under > /usr/local, is it possible to configure and build the compiler in such a > way that a binary packaging method such as RPM can allow a user to specify > an alternate installation poin

packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations?

Given a binary distibution of GCC, for example, built to install under /usr/local, is it possible to configure and build the compiler in such a way that a binary packaging method such as RPM can allow a user to specify an alternate installation point (perhaps /opt, or even the user's home director