Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-27 Thread Toon Moene
On 10/26/2016 11:24 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Toon Moene wrote: But that is for code that read math function prototypes in C style .h files - so not for Fortran or Ada. That was the purpose of my proposal: to treat glibc vectorized log/exp/sin/cos/tan functi

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Toon Moene wrote: > On 10/25/2016 10:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Toon Moene wrote: > > >>> Note that I haven't found the time to implement the vectorization of >>> log/exp/sin/cos/tan functions that I described here: >>> >>>

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-25 Thread Toon Moene
On 10/25/2016 10:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Toon Moene wrote: Note that I haven't found the time to implement the vectorization of log/exp/sin/cos/tan functions that I described here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-01/msg00039.html It works transparent

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-25 Thread Maxim Ostapenko
On 25/10/16 11:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:32:25AM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: On 21/10/16 16:46, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Status == Trunk which will eventually become GCC 7 is still in Stage 1 but its end is near and we are planning to transition into Stage 3 startin

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:32:25AM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > On 21/10/16 16:46, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >Status > >== > > > >Trunk which will eventually become GCC 7 is still in Stage 1 but its > >end is near and we are planning to transition into Stage 3 starting > >Nov 13th end of day ti

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-25 Thread Maxim Ostapenko
Hi, On 21/10/16 16:46, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Status == Trunk which will eventually become GCC 7 is still in Stage 1 but its end is near and we are planning to transition into Stage 3 starting Nov 13th end of day time zone of your choice. This means it is time to get things you want to have

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Toon Moene wrote: > On 10/21/2016 03:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> Status >> == >> >> Trunk which will eventually become GCC 7 is still in Stage 1 but its >> end is near and we are planning to transition into Stage 3 starting >> Nov 13th end of day time zon

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-24 Thread Eric Gallager
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Status > == > > Trunk which will eventually become GCC 7 is still in Stage 1 but its > end is near and we are planning to transition into Stage 3 starting > Nov 13th end of day time zone of your choice. > > This means it is time to get th

Re: GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-24 Thread Toon Moene
On 10/21/2016 03:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Status == Trunk which will eventually become GCC 7 is still in Stage 1 but its end is near and we are planning to transition into Stage 3 starting Nov 13th end of day time zone of your choice. Note that I haven't found the time to implement the

GCC 7.0.0 Status Report (2016-10-21)

2016-10-21 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == Trunk which will eventually become GCC 7 is still in Stage 1 but its end is near and we are planning to transition into Stage 3 starting Nov 13th end of day time zone of your choice. This means it is time to get things you want to have in GCC 7 finalized and reviewed. As usual ther