Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-04 Thread Dave Korn
Jack Howarth wrote: > Thanks in advance for getting this libtool update into gcc 4.5. I'd just like to add: thanks (in behind) for all the work you've put in this summer getting everything updated. You done a really good job and we're all better off for it :) cheers, DaveK

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-04 Thread Jack Howarth
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:32:38PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Jack Howarth wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:22:56AM CET: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:08:49PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > > > The Libtool update would fix a coup

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jack Howarth wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:15:59PM CET: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:32:38PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Do you need anything to test the patch before it is applied, or did you > > mean to test it when it has been applied? (To test this patch that does > > not inclu

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-03 Thread Jack Howarth
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:32:38PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Do you need anything to test the patch before it is applied, or did you > mean to test it when it has been applied? (To test this patch that does > not include regenerated files, apply it, then > find $srcdir -name configure |

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jack Howarth wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:22:56AM CET: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:08:49PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > The Libtool update would fix a couple of bugs, one of which is important > > > for mi...@least. Any chance th

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-02 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:08:49PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Hello Richard, > > > > * Richard Guenther wrote on Wed, Dec 02, 2...@01:32:24PM CET: > > > The trunk is in regression and documentation fixes only mode, > > > Stage 3 has ended yes

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Richard, > > * Richard Guenther wrote on Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:32:24PM CET: > > The trunk is in regression and documentation fixes only mode, > > Stage 3 has ended yesterday. Release branch rules are now > > in effect for all changes to trunk

Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-02 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Richard, * Richard Guenther wrote on Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:32:24PM CET: > The trunk is in regression and documentation fixes only mode, > Stage 3 has ended yesterday. Release branch rules are now > in effect for all changes to trunk that touch release critical > parts of the compiler (pri

GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02)

2009-12-02 Thread Richard Guenther
Status == The trunk is in regression and documentation fixes only mode, Stage 3 has ended yesterday. Release branch rules are now in effect for all changes to trunk that touch release critical parts of the compiler (primary and secondary targets, C and C++ and their runtimes). There will be