Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)

2007-04-26 Thread Mark Mitchell
Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: > >> Richard Guenther wrote on 04/25/07 03:54: >> >>> I guess I can only produce a workaround, as I'm not too deeply into >>> the aliasing stuff. So I'd prefer if Danny or Diego could have a look >>> (Danny apperantly doesn't hav

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)

2007-04-26 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Diego Novillo wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote on 04/25/07 03:54: > > > I guess I can only produce a workaround, as I'm not too deeply into > > the aliasing stuff. So I'd prefer if Danny or Diego could have a look > > (Danny apperantly doesn't have time to do so, my bets for

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)

2007-04-25 Thread Mark Mitchell
Zdenek Dvorak wrote: > Hello, > >> 4. PR 31360: Missed optimization >> >> I don't generally mark missed optimization bugs as P1, but not hoisting >> loads of zero out of a 4-instruction loop is bad. Zdenek has fixed this >> on mainline. Andrew says that patch has a bug. So, what's the story her

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)

2007-04-25 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, > 4. PR 31360: Missed optimization > > I don't generally mark missed optimization bugs as P1, but not hoisting > loads of zero out of a 4-instruction loop is bad. Zdenek has fixed this > on mainline. Andrew says that patch has a bug. So, what's the story here? I found the problem, I wi

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)

2007-04-25 Thread Diego Novillo
Richard Guenther wrote on 04/25/07 03:54: > I guess I can only produce a workaround, as I'm not too deeply into > the aliasing stuff. So I'd prefer if Danny or Diego could have a look > (Danny apperantly doesn't have time to do so, my bets for Diego are > similar), but I'll give the workaround I

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)

2007-04-25 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: > 3. PR 30567: Wrong code with -O3 due to aliasing problems > > Richard G. has analyzed this and proposed a patch. Richard, is this > ready to go? If not, do you need help? I guess I can only produce a workaround, as I'm not too deeply into the aliasin

[Committed] Fix PR30222 for 4.2 [Was: Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)]

2007-04-24 Thread Andrew Pinski
On 4/24/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2. PR 30222: crash on gcc.target/i386/vectorize1.c This PR is apparently due to only part of a mainline patch being applied to 4.2. It was so diagnosed in December 2006, but nobody has identified the missing part of the mainline patch. Andre

GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)

2007-04-24 Thread Mark Mitchell
[I apologize to those of you receiving duplicate copies of this mail. I thought so hard about copying people that I forgot to address to the list.] Table of contents: 1. PRs 2. Schedule 3. Rationale If you're in the CC: list, there are possible action items for you below. (Recent feedback was