Re: GCC 4.1.1 Status Report (2006-05-15)

2006-05-16 Thread Richard Guenther
On 5/16/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Pinski wrote: > Mark, > >> Therefore, effective midnight tonight (i.e., 12:00AM May 17th in >> California), the 4.1 branch will be frozen. (I previously announced May >> 15th as a target release date.) After that point, all changes, >>

Re: GCC 4.1.1 Status Report (2006-05-15)

2006-05-15 Thread Mark Mitchell
Andrew Pinski wrote: > Mark, > >> Therefore, effective midnight tonight (i.e., 12:00AM May 17th in >> California), the 4.1 branch will be frozen. (I previously announced May >> 15th as a target release date.) After that point, all changes, >> including previously approved patches, need my explic

Re: GCC 4.1.1 Status Report (2006-05-15)

2006-05-15 Thread Andrew Pinski
Mark, > Therefore, effective midnight tonight (i.e., 12:00AM May 17th in > California), the 4.1 branch will be frozen. (I previously announced May > 15th as a target release date.) After that point, all changes, > including previously approved patches, need my explicit approval. I'll > create 4

GCC 4.1.1 Status Report (2006-05-15)

2006-05-15 Thread Mark Mitchell
There are now 98 serious regressions open against GCC 4.1, including 9 P1s. However, none of these are -- as far as I can tell -- regressions from 4.1.0; they are all regressions from previous releases. Given that we've fixed 114 bugs since 4.1.0, I think it's time to create a 4.1.1 release. The