Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Eric Botcazou
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-03/msg01875.html A bit outdated. Most of them should be gone as of today. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Laurent GUERBY
Thanks, Andreas Jaeger just sent a more recent run: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-04/msg00631.html === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu Just perfect :) Laurent

GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Laurent GUERBY writes: > Hi, fromm gcc-testresults here is where we stand on 4.0/Ada after > the tree-sra Ada patch. I'm looking for results for platforms where I > believe Ada could work: > > powerpc-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-03/msg01875.html

Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:18:09PM +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > Unfortunately this is a real core dump while running the test on my > machine (glibc-2.3.3-118 SuSE 9.2) at -O2 or -O0, and this does not > reproduce under GDB, see below. I don't know about valgrind on x86_64, > is it available? No

Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Richard Kenner
> > FAIL: cxa5012 > > I think this one is an artifact (sometimes an error is reported when > chopping/building/running the test). x86_64-linux is clean too. Unfortunately this is a real core dump while running the test on my machine (glibc-2.3.3-118 SuSE 9.2) at -O2 or

Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Ok thanks for the information! I'll post formal results for Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6, 7, 8 and 9 later today. > > > x86_64-linux > > > FAIL: cxa5012 > > > > I think this one is an artifact (sometimes an error is reported when > > chopping/building/running the test). x86_64-linux is clean too. > > U

Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 11:54 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > no FAIL: > > sparc-linux > > s390-linux > > x86-linux > > sparc-sun-solaris is clean, for all supported versions of Solaris, except > maybe 10. Ok thanks for the information! > > x86_64-linux > > FAIL: cxa5012 > > I think this one is

Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Eric Botcazou
> no FAIL: > sparc-linux > s390-linux > x86-linux sparc-sun-solaris is clean, for all supported versions of Solaris, except maybe 10. > x86_64-linux > FAIL: cxa5012 I think this one is an artifact (sometimes an error is reported when chopping/building/running the test). x86_64-linux is clean

GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

2005-04-09 Thread Laurent GUERBY
Hi, fromm gcc-testresults here is where we stand on 4.0/Ada after the tree-sra Ada patch. I'm looking for results for platforms where I believe Ada could work: powerpc-linux powerpc-darwin x86-cygwin (may be in -mno-cygwin too?) sparc-solaris So if you have access to one of these platforms, plea