Gerald Pfeifer wrote, On 08/05/11 14:02:
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I would propose to clarify as:
"To ensure that GCC finds the GNU assembler (or the GNU linker),"
I see no harm in that change, Gerald, what do you think?
Agreed. Things would have been different twenty years
> Agreed. Things would have been different twenty years ago, but these
> days using linker is a lot more natural and common (as a grep in gcc/doc
> confirms, too).
Even 20 years ago, I think "linker" would have been the more natural
word. I remember "linker" from my IBM days in the early 80's.
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I would propose to clarify as:
>>
>> "To ensure that GCC finds the GNU assembler (or the GNU linker),"
> I see no harm in that change, Gerald, what do you think?
Agreed. Things would have been different twenty years ago, but these
days using linker is
On 6 May 2011 21:19, Jon Grant wrote:
> Hello. thank you for your reply.
>
> Jonathan Wakely wrote, On 05/05/11 22:47:
>>
>> On 5 May 2011 22:30, Jon Grant wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Just looking at this page:
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
>>>
>>> I saw this text "(the GNU loader)". Is
Hello. thank you for your reply.
Jonathan Wakely wrote, On 05/05/11 22:47:
On 5 May 2011 22:30, Jon Grant wrote:
Hello
Just looking at this page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
I saw this text "(the GNU loader)". Is this really an alternative name
for gas? I've not seen it called GNU loader
On 5 May 2011 22:30, Jon Grant wrote:
> Hello
>
> Just looking at this page:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
>
> I saw this text "(the GNU loader)". Is this really an alternative name
> for gas? I've not seen it called GNU loader elsewhere. I was wondering
> if the text could just be removed.
Hello
Just looking at this page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
I saw this text "(the GNU loader)". Is this really an alternative name
for gas? I've not seen it called GNU loader elsewhere. I was wondering
if the text could just be removed.
Please keep my email address in any replies.
Best re