Forgot to reply all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brendon Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/11/30
Subject: Re: Functional Purity
To: David Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sounds like you want to (at least):
>
> 1) automatically qualify every d
> The reason for posting this is to ask. Is there code in GCC that
> already does something "similar" in say one of the optimisation passes
> so i can get a look at how to get started on this?
ipa-pure-const.c
--
Eric Botcazou
Brendon Costa wrote:
> I want to use GCC to categorise "functional purity" in C++. My
> definition will differ from classic functional purity. In particular:
>
> A function is considered pure if it makes no changes to existing
> memory or program state. There may be a fe
When categorising a functions purity i also would like to identify the
cause of the impurity. In particular for a function that is impure i
want to categorise the impurity cause as:
* modifies global state
* modifies a function parameter
* modifies the object state (this is an extension of the fun
Hi all,
I want to use GCC to categorise "functional purity" in C++. My
definition will differ from classic functional purity. In particular:
A function is considered pure if it makes no changes to existing
memory or program state. There may be a few exceptions to this rule
such as for
