On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Katsunori Kumatani
> wrote:
>> Yes, it seems walk_tree does the job, I was probably doing something
>> wrong before. Thank you.
>>
>> I have a question about it. Am I correct in assuming I only have to
>> c
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Katsunori Kumatani
wrote:
> Yes, it seems walk_tree does the job, I was probably doing something
> wrong before. Thank you.
>
> I have a question about it. Am I correct in assuming I only have to
> check the subtrees of nodes that satisfy EXPR_P? So for nodes that
Yes, it seems walk_tree does the job, I was probably doing something
wrong before. Thank you.
I have a question about it. Am I correct in assuming I only have to
check the subtrees of nodes that satisfy EXPR_P? So for nodes that
aren't EXPR_P, can I just set *walkSubtrees to 0, or will that miss
s
On November 18, 2017 5:38:35 PM GMT+01:00, Katsunori Kumatani
wrote:
>Hello, I'm doing some testing with a gcc plugin (also helped me
>understand a lot of how GCC works) but I've hit a roadblock.
>
>I want to find all of a function body's CALL_EXPR nodes (i.e. what
>calls it has) early during GEN
Hello, I'm doing some testing with a gcc plugin (also helped me
understand a lot of how GCC works) but I've hit a roadblock.
I want to find all of a function body's CALL_EXPR nodes (i.e. what
calls it has) early during GENERIC, so I assume the
PLUGIN_PRE_GENERICIZE hook is what I should use right?
