Hi,
Antoine Eiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why can I not do "foo(a + i * x)" then I can do "foo(i * x)" ou "foo(a + i)" ?*
[...]
When a try to compile a program gcc answer:
"
tab.c:22: erreur: invalid operand to binary operator
i_28 * 4;
tab.c:22: erreur interne du compilateur: verify_stm
Quoting Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Antoine" == Antoine Eiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Without more information I don't know how to answer your question.
But I do have a question for you...
Antoine> I must calculate the address of an element's array.
Antoine> If the size of an element
> "Antoine" == Antoine Eiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Without more information I don't know how to answer your question.
But I do have a question for you...
Antoine> I must calculate the address of an element's array.
Antoine> If the size of an element is one integer it's good.
Antoine> I
Dear all,
I must calculate the address of an element's array.
If the size of an element is one integer it's good.
I do like that:
new_rhs=fold_build2(PLUS_EXPR,TREE_TYPE(TREE_OPERAND(rhs,1)),
build1(ADDR_EXPR, build_pointer_type (TREE_TYPE
(array)),array),
