On Mai 08 2024, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> removed from C99.
I think you mean "removed from C *after* C99".
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 2:06 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs via Gcc wrote:
> > On 08.05.24 11:50, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics
> > > > and features that were removed fro
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs via Gcc wrote:
> On 08.05.24 11:50, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics
> > > and features that were removed from C99"
> > >
> > > Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense
On 08.05.24 11:50, Richard Biener wrote:
"With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics
and features that were removed from C99"
Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense.
In the context of mentioning the -std=gnu89/-std=c89 workarounds
I thought as much, but shoul
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:39 AM Matthias Urlichs via Gcc
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/porting_to.html states:
>
> "With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics
> and features that were removed from C99"
>
> Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense.
Hello,
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/porting_to.html states:
"With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics
and features that were removed from C99"
Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense.
--
-- regards
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description:
