Re: Discussion about arm testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673

2023-11-24 Thread Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
On 24/11/2023 08:09, Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc wrote: Hi Richard, Ping. Please let me know if the test failure that I mentioned in the mail below can be handled by changing the expected generated code. I am not conversant with arm, and hence would appreciate your help. Regards, Surya On

Re: Discussion about arm testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673

2023-11-24 Thread Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
Hi Richard, Ping. Please let me know if the test failure that I mentioned in the mail below can be handled by changing the expected generated code. I am not conversant with arm, and hence would appreciate your help. Regards, Surya On 03/11/23 4:58 pm, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote: > Hi Richard, >

Discussion about arm testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673

2023-11-03 Thread Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
Hi Richard, I had submitted a patch for review (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/631849.html) regarding scaling save/restore costs of callee save registers with block frequency in the IRA pass (PR111673). This patch has been approved by VMakarov (https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma