On 11/18/05, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 11:40 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > A nightmare scenario is debugging the compiler when its behaviour
> > changes due to using "-S". Assembly source is something that we
> > maintainers use more than anyone else.
>
> I
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 11:40 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> A nightmare scenario is debugging the compiler when its behaviour
> changes due to using "-S". Assembly source is something that we
> maintainers use more than anyone else.
If we go the direct generation route, I think it would be more
effi
Richard Earnshaw writes:
> - Then, incrementally, we can bypass the parse layer to call routines
> directly in the assembler. This can be done both for directives and for
> assembly of instructions. *but it can all be done incrementally*.
>
> The main difficulty is preserving -S output in
