On 12/13/23 23:25, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
As for gdbsim/openocd, I remember that we did have nds32 contributions
previously:
- gdb: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-07/msg00223.html
- openocd: http://openocd.zylin.com/1259
I suppose they have recently been dropped from the cur
On 2023/12/12 07:43 UTC+8, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
On 12/11/23 16:19, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
nds32 support in Linux was removed last year:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Andes-Tech-NDS32-Removal
The support for glibc never made it upstream as far as I can tell either.
What are others th
On 2023/12/12 07:43 UTC+8, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
On 12/11/23 16:19, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
nds32 support in Linux was removed last year:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Andes-Tech-NDS32-Removal
The support for glibc never made it upstream as far as I can tell either.
What are others th
On 12/11/23 16:19, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
nds32 support in Linux was removed last year:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Andes-Tech-NDS32-Removal
The support for glibc never made it upstream as far as I can tell either.
What are others thoughts on this?
I believe the architecture is dead,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:20 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc
wrote:
> nds32 support in Linux was removed last year:
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/Andes-Tech-NDS32-Removal
>
> The support for glibc never made it upstream as far as I can tell either.
>
> What are others thoughts on this?
>
Looks like a
nds32 support in Linux was removed last year:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Andes-Tech-NDS32-Removal
The support for glibc never made it upstream as far as I can tell either.
What are others thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
