ion I have.
Regards,
Paulo Matos
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxim Kuvyrkov [mailto:ma...@kugelworks.com]
> Sent: 16 July 2013 05:02
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Delay scheduling due to possible future multiple issue in VLIW
>
> Pa
iple issue
> has to contend with other problems.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Paulo Matos
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paulo
>> Matos
>> Sent: 26 June 2013 15:08
>> T
w...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Paulo
> Matos
> Sent: 26 June 2013 15:08
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Delay scheduling due to possible future multiple issue in VLIW
>
> Hello,
>
> We have a port for a VLIW machine using gcc head 4.8 with an maximum
Hello,
We have a port for a VLIW machine using gcc head 4.8 with an maximum issue of 2
per clock cycle (sometimes only 1 due to machine constraints).
We are seeing the following situation in sched2:
;; --- forward dependences:
;; --- Region Dependences --- b 3 bb
