On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:26:58AM +, Tomar, Sourabh Singh wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying this. I went through literature and other stuff
> available, it describes operation and semantics. Unfortunately I wasn't
> able to get to the actual DWARF Issue/proposal when it was proposed.
>
> One s
cc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: DW_OP_implict_value usage and motivation
[CAUTION: External Email]
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 04:23:58PM +, Tomar, Sourabh Singh wrote:
> Consider the following test case:
> [..]
> int main () {
> __int128 newVar = 8;
> newVar = ~n
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 04:23:58PM +, Tomar, Sourabh Singh wrote:
> Consider the following test case:
> [..]
> int main () {
> __int128 newVar = 8;
> newVar = ~newVar;
> return 0;
> }
DW_OP_implicit_value as well as DW_OP_stack_value is described in DWARF4/5,
just read
Hello Everyone,
Consider the following test case:
[..]
int main () {
__int128 newVar = 8;
newVar = ~newVar;
return 0;
}
[..]
Compiled as: $gcc foo.c -g -O1
produces DWARF for "newVar" as:
[..]
0x004f: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name("newVar")
