Hello Toon,
the implementation is not finished, we have just made some tests for now.
If no one sees huge problems with this new approach, we will continue to
implement and stabilize it.
Thank you for your interest !
Sylvain
On 10/17/23 22:37, Toon Moene wrote:
Sylvain,
Is this on a branc
Sylvain,
Is this on a branch in your github repository
https://github.com/kalray/gcc
somewhere ?
That would make it easier to test it for me (and probably others).
See for instance my mail here (d.d. Thu Oct 5 14:45:05 GMT 2023):
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-October/242643.
Hi,
We are trying to update our patches on complex numbers to take into
account what has been discussed.
The main change from our previous patches consists of replacing vectors
of complex types with classical vectors of real types (ex V4SF instead
of V2SC) associated with existing complex op
On 9/26/23 20:40, Toon Moene wrote:
/On 9/26/23 09:30, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: />>//>>>/On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc />>>/ wrote: />>///As I said at the end of the presentation, we have written a paper which //explains //our implementation in details. Yo
On 9/26/23 20:40, Toon Moene wrote:
On 9/26/23 09:30, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc
wrote:
As I said at the end of the presentation, we have written a paper which
explains
our implementation in details. You can find it on the wiki page
On 9/26/23 09:30, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote:
As I said at the end of the presentation, we have written a paper which
explains
our implementation in details. You can find it on the wiki page of the
Cauldron
(https://gcc.gnu.org/w
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023, Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote:
> --> Idea: Add an attribute to the Tree complex type which specify pure real /
> pure
> imaginary / full complex ?
If you start from the implementation approach of lowering imaginary type
operations in the front end, a flag on a REAL_TYPE wou
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 08:29:16AM +, Tamar Christina via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to find you two on Sunday but couldn't locate you. Thanks for the
> presentation!
Yes, sadly we could not attend on Sunday because we wanted to be back
for Monday.
> > >
> > > We had very interesting disc
nu.org;
> > sylvain.no...@hotmail.fr
> > Subject: Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:30:21AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc
> > wrote:
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc On Behalf
> Of Paul Iannetta via Gcc
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 9:54 AM
> To: Richard Biener
> Cc: Sylvain Noiry ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org;
> sylvain.no...@hotmail.fr
> Subject: Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary
&
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:30:21AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We had very interesting discussions during our presentation with Paul on
> > the
> > support of complex numbers in gcc at the Cauldron.
> >
> >
Hi,
I tried to find you two on Sunday but couldn't locate you. Thanks for the
presentation!
> >
> > We had very interesting discussions during our presentation with Paul
> > on the support of complex numbers in gcc at the Cauldron.
> >
> > Thank you all for your participation !
> >
> > Here is a
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We had very interesting discussions during our presentation with Paul on
> the
> support of complex numbers in gcc at the Cauldron.
>
> Thank you all for your participation !
>
> Here is a small summary from our viewpoint:
>
Hi,
We had very interesting discussions during our presentation with Paul on
the
support of complex numbers in gcc at the Cauldron.
Thank you all for your participation !
Here is a small summary from our viewpoint:
- Replace CONCAT with a backend defined internal representation in RTL
--> No
14 matches
Mail list logo
