Re: Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-16 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 22:59:45 +0100, Ben Boeckel wrote: > But we are finally at a point where named modules can be experimented > with. The timeline has been (roughly): > > - 2019 Feb: pushing to get dependency scanning possible (I have patches > to CMake and GCC to proof-of-concept at the Ko

Re: Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-16 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
Ugh, sorry. the lack of Subject/References broke threading and I missed this continuation. On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 22:46:23 +, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc wrote: > I think it might be a possibility given how compiler vendors (and also > vendors of tools like CMake) aren't really gettin

Re: Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-12 Thread Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:46:23PM +, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc wrote: > Tobias wrote: > > >>Am Mi., 12. Feb. 2025 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Frederick Virchanza Gotham: > >> This would be an alternative to modules (seeing as how modules might > >> become deprecated in the future). > > >H

Re: Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 22:47, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc wrote: > > Tobias wrote: > > >>Am Mi., 12. Feb. 2025 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Frederick Virchanza Gotham: > >> This would be an alternative to modules (seeing as how modules might > >> become deprecated in the future). > > >Huch? Where d

Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-12 Thread Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
Tobias wrote: >>Am Mi., 12. Feb. 2025 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Frederick Virchanza Gotham: >> This would be an alternative to modules (seeing as how modules might >> become deprecated in the future). >Huch? Where did you catch that? Did I miss something? I think it might be a possibility given how

Re: Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, 00:24 Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc, < gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > As the GNU compiler make its way through a translation unit, more and > more classes get declared. So for each translation unit, the compiler > maintains a list of what types it has seen so far. > > Could som

Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-08 Thread Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
As the GNU compiler make its way through a translation unit, more and more classes get declared. So for each translation unit, the compiler maintains a list of what types it has seen so far. Could someone please point me to where in the GNU g++ source code I will find this container object? What's