On 11/30/2011 10:07 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> PS. Reflecting upon it, I wonder if it could be a part of the gcc
> libraries like libgomp or libitm are. During configuration we could
> check to see if there is an existing libatomic in the system, and if
> there is NOT, enable building libatomic
Libstdc++-v3 use to provide a locked implementation of classes for sizes
which didn't have lock-free support. That was removed for this release
as it caused a program compiled with a specific version of GCC to be
locked into that implementation. The design criteria for the new
__atomic builti
