s passing the -S and -o
> > > > > .o options) and also skip the assembler option while
> > using
> > > > > -fbypass-asm option but I am not sure. Can Jan or Martin please shed
> > some
> > > > > light on this?
> > > > Yes, compiler drivers decides
passing the -S and -o
> > > > .o options) and also skip the assembler option while
> using
> > > > -fbypass-asm option but I am not sure. Can Jan or Martin please shed
> some
> > > > light on this?
> > > Yes, compiler drivers decides what to do and it needs
n crtbegin.o it will also need to pass correct
> > crtbegin to *1 binary. This is generally not that hard to do, just
> > needs to be done :)
> >
> Honza
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > >
> > > Rishi Raj
> > >
> > > On Su
he way of reading in crtbegin.o it will also need to pass correct
>> crtbegin to *1 binary. This is generally not that hard to do, just
>> needs to be done :)
>>
> Honza
>> >
>> > Thanks & Regards
>> >
>> > Rishi Raj
>> >
>> &g
Sorry, I messed subject in my previous two emails :( so I am sending it
again.
I have completed a draft proposal for this project. I will appreciate Jan,
Martin, or anybody else feedback on the same.
Here is the link to my proposal
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r9kzsU96kOYfIhWZx62jx4ALG-J_aJs
enerally not that hard to do, just
> needs to be done :)
>
Honza
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> >
> > Rishi Raj
> >
> > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 03:05, Rishi Raj wrote:
> >
> > > Hii Everyone,
> > > I had already expressed my interest
in crtbegin.o it will also need to pass correct
> crtbegin to *1 binary. This is generally not that hard to do, just
> needs to be done :)
>
Honza
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> >
> > Rishi Raj
> >
> > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 03:05, Rishi Raj wrote:
> >
at 03:05, Rishi Raj wrote:
>
> > Hii Everyone,
> > I had already expressed my interest in the " Bypass assembler when
> > generating LTO object files" project and making a proposal for the same. I
> > know I should have done it earlier but I was admitted to
tion while using
-fbypass-asm option but I am not sure. Can Jan or Martin please shed some
light on this?
Thanks & Regards
Rishi Raj
On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 03:05, Rishi Raj wrote:
> Hii Everyone,
> I had already expressed my interest in the " Bypass assembler when
> generati
Hii Everyone,
I had already expressed my interest in the " Bypass assembler when
generating LTO object files" project and making a proposal for the same. I
know I should have done it earlier but I was admitted to the hospital for
past few days :(.
I have a few doubts.
1)
"One prob
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:48 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are delighted you found looking into GCC interesting.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 09 2023, Madhu patel via Gcc wrote:
>> > Hi Jan,
>> >
>> > I'm interested in work
Hello,
We are delighted you found looking into GCC interesting.
On Thu, Mar 09 2023, Madhu patel via Gcc wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> I'm interested in working on the project `Bypass assembler when generating
> LTO object files` in the GCC organization through GSoC'2023.
Great
Hi Jan,
I'm interested in working on the project `Bypass assembler when generating
LTO object files` in the GCC organization through GSoC'2023.
I am Madhu Patel, a fourth-year B.Tech. student in Computer Science at
IGDTUW, with a CGPA of 8.7/10. I have previously interned at Adobe Ind
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 18 2022, Mohamed Atef wrote:
> Hello,
>I am interested in working in this project during my free time, is
> understanding this https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization
> A good starting point
That section of the Wiki is very old. You may find bits there that are
still
Hello,
I am interested in working in this project during my free time, is
understanding this https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization
A good starting point
Mohamed
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 2:53 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 12 Apr 2022, at 13:31, Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > On 4/12/22 11:58, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:20 AM Jan Hubicka via Gcc
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
>
>
> > On 08-Apr-2022, at 6:32 PM, Jan
> On 12 Apr 2022, at 13:31, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 4/12/22 11:58, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:20 AM Jan Hubicka via Gcc wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
> On 08-Apr-2022, at 6:32 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Ankur,
>> I was browsing the list of submi
On 4/12/22 11:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:20 AM Jan Hubicka via Gcc wrote:
Hi,
On 08-Apr-2022, at 6:32 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Ankur,
I was browsing the list of submitted GSoC projects this year and the
project regarding bypassing assembler when generating LTO ob
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:20 AM Jan Hubicka via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >
> >
> > > On 08-Apr-2022, at 6:32 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >
> > > Ankur,
> > >> I was browsing the list of submitted GSoC projects this year and the
> > >> project regarding bypassing assembler when generating LTO object f
Hi,
>
>
> > On 08-Apr-2022, at 6:32 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > Ankur,
> >> I was browsing the list of submitted GSoC projects this year and the
> >> project regarding bypassing assembler when generating LTO object files
> >> caught my eye.
> > I apologize for late reply. I would be very ha
> On 08-Apr-2022, at 6:32 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Ankur,
>> I was browsing the list of submitted GSoC projects this year and the
>> project regarding bypassing assembler when generating LTO object files
>> caught my eye.
> I apologize for late reply. I would be very happy to mentor this
>
Ankur,
> I was browsing the list of submitted GSoC projects this year and the
> project regarding bypassing assembler when generating LTO object files
> caught my eye.
I apologize for late reply. I would be very happy to mentor this
project.
>
> I already have a gcc built from source (sync-ed wit
Hi,
I was browsing the list of submitted GSoC projects this year and the
project regarding bypassing assembler when generating LTO object files
caught my eye.
I already have a gcc built from source (sync-ed with trunk/master) and
launched the test-suite on it.
I am currently in process of unders
23 matches
Mail list logo
