Re: Bug triage

2011-01-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 10 January 2011 16:08, Jeff Law wrote: > > But I think the key is to just keep the necessary builds hanging around, > at least for the most popular targets. The GCC Compile Farm has a number of releases installed under /opt/cfarm/release/ See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm

Re: Bug triage

2011-01-10 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/07/11 14:06, Tony Poppleton wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. > >> Moving the test case into an attachment won't be useful. What would be >> useful is recasting the test case into a form which can be used in the >> gcc testsuite, if possible >

Re: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Tony Poppleton
Thanks for the feedback. > Moving the test case into an attachment won't be useful. What would be > useful is recasting the test case into a form which can be used in the > gcc testsuite, if possible Whilst I would like to be able to submit new test cases as I go, as you (Ian) pointed out this m

Re: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > 5. Similarly, if I mark a bug as known to work in 4.5.2, will this > > lead to it eventually being closed? > > Yes, when the 4.4 release is closed, bugs known to work in 4.5 will be > closed. That's not how it works. I did the last couple of branc

Re: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 7 January 2011 04:59, Tony Poppleton wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to help with some gcc bug triage, and have a few > questions about doing so. Excellent, thanks for volunteering your time. > For example, in cases where a bug doesn't have a test case as an > attachmen

Re: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:31:28PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > 2. A large number of bugs seem to not be targetted for any particular > > release, e.g. of the 4389 open bugs, only 296 are listed as targetted > > for 4.6.0. Why is there such a discrepency? > > > > Incidentally, my main focus

Re: Bug triage

2011-01-06 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Tony Poppleton writes: > 1. My plan is to start testing bugs against the latest stable build > (4.5.2), on an Intel x86-64 architecture (possibly also testing 32 bit > bugs). My main focus will be on "missed-optimizations", although I > will try and do others too. I have read the > http://gcc.g

Bug triage

2011-01-06 Thread Tony Poppleton
Hi, I would like to help with some gcc bug triage, and have a few questions about doing so. 1. My plan is to start testing bugs against the latest stable build (4.5.2), on an Intel x86-64 architecture (possibly also testing 32 bit bugs). My main focus will be on "missed-optimizations"