Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-19 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 11/19/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: Tobias Burnus writes: No, finding libgfortran.spec at compile time works - it is all about finding it at run time. pardon me: AFAIK the spec files are *only* used by the compiler driver, not at runtime of the resulting executables. Well, the spec fi

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-19 Thread Rainer Orth
Tobias Burnus writes: > No, finding libgfortran.spec at compile time works - it is all about > finding it at run time. pardon me: AFAIK the spec files are *only* used by the compiler driver, not at runtime of the resulting executables. >> while my issue is about >> finding the right (64-bit) li

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-19 Thread Rainer Orth
Ralf Wildenhues writes: >> the Automake manual can be read otherwise: ch. 8.3.7 `_LIBADD', >> `_LDFLAGS', and `_LIBTOOLFLAGS' states: >> >> As shown in previous sections, the `LIBRARY_LIBADD' variable should be >> used to list extra libtool objects (`.lo' files) or libtool libraries >> (`.

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-18 Thread Tobias Burnus
Rainer Orth wrote: Tobias Burnus writes: Rainer Orth wrote: While the build completed with the patch I've posted, fortran testing for the non-default multilib is completely broken, e.g. That's in a way the a duplicate of PR 46516. Or at least the solution is I don't think so: this seems to b

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Rainer Orth wrote on Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:32:59PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues writes: > > * Rainer Orth wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15:55PM CET: > >> > >> * One cannot -lm to libquadmath_la_LIBADD since that gets passed to nm, > >> which doesn't know (and doesn't need to be run) -lm. > > >

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-18 Thread Rainer Orth
Ralf Wildenhues writes: > * Rainer Orth wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15:55PM CET: >> >> * One cannot -lm to libquadmath_la_LIBADD since that gets passed to nm, >> which doesn't know (and doesn't need to be run) -lm. > > That's a bug in the rule using nm then, though. I'm not completely su

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-18 Thread Rainer Orth
Tobias Burnus writes: > Rainer Orth wrote: >> While the build completed with the patch I've posted, fortran testing >> for the non-default multilib is completely broken, e.g. > > That's in a way the a duplicate of PR 46516. Or at least the solution is I don't think so: this seems to be an issue

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-18 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 11/18/2010 07:50 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Rainer Orth wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15:55PM CET: * One cannot -lm to libquadmath_la_LIBADD since that gets passed to nm, which doesn't know (and doesn't need to be run) -lm. That's a bug in the rule using nm then, though. [...] Using

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Rainer Orth wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15:55PM CET: > > * One cannot -lm to libquadmath_la_LIBADD since that gets passed to nm, > which doesn't know (and doesn't need to be run) -lm. That's a bug in the rule using nm then, though. > Again, as in > libjava/Makefile.am, I've moved it

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Rainer Orth wrote: While the build completed with the patch I've posted, fortran testing for the non-default multilib is completely broken, e.g. That's in a way the a duplicate of PR 46516. Or at least the solution is similar: Getting rid of libgfortran.spec and fall back (again) to having th

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Rainer Orth
Rainer Orth writes: > I won't post a proper patch until it has completed, just a heads-up to > those running into the same failures. While the build completed with the patch I've posted, fortran testing for the non-default multilib is completely broken, e.g. Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/var/g

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Rainer Orth
Ralf Wildenhues writes: > * Tobias Burnus wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:20:39PM CET: >> b) Building with a cross compiler is not supported by the >> libquadmath configure script > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520 > > You should probably try out GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES in configu

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Tobias Burnus wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:20:39PM CET: > b) Building with a cross compiler is not supported by the > libquadmath configure script > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520 You should probably try out GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES in configure.ac and check with a couple of cr

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Art Haas wrote: My build this morning failed when libquadmath was being built. Things failed when configuring in the 'amd64' subdirectory - the bits below are taken from the 'config.log' in that directory: There are two known problems: a) libquadmath should - at least for now - only be build b

Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Art Haas
Hi. My build this morning failed when libquadmath was being built. Things failed when configuring in the 'amd64' subdirectory - the bits below are taken from the 'config.log' in that directory: configure:3040: /export/home/arth/gnu/gcc-1117/./gcc/xgcc -B/export/home/arth/gnu/gcc-1117/./gcc/ -B/