On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 12:58 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:02:13PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > The reason is that the unwinder data for CR in the vDSO is wrong. The
> > > line that affects the CR is her
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:02:13PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > The reason is that the unwinder data for CR in the vDSO is wrong. The
> > line that affects the CR is here in
My fault.
> According to __builtin_init_dwarf_reg_size_
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:22:31PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > and similarly linux-unwind.h should do:
> > >
> > > fs->regs.reg[R_CR2].loc.offset = (long) ®s->ccr - new_cfa;
> > > /* CR? regs are just 32-bit and PPC is big-endian. */
> > > fs->r
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:22:31PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > and similarly linux-unwind.h should do:
> >
> > fs->regs.reg[R_CR2].loc.offset = (long) ®s->ccr - new_cfa;
> > /* CR? regs are just 32-bit and PPC is big-endian. */
> > fs->regs.reg[R_CR2].loc.offset += sizeof (lon
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:02:13PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > The reason is that the unwinder data for CR in the vDSO is wrong. The
> > line that affects the CR is here in
>
> According to __builtin_init_dwarf_reg_size_table on ppc64-linux
> r0..r31, fp0..fp31, m
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:02:13PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> The reason is that the unwinder data for CR in the vDSO is wrong. The
> line that affects the CR is here in
According to __builtin_init_dwarf_reg_size_table on ppc64-linux
r0..r31, fp0..fp31, mq, lr, ctr, ap, vrsave, vscr, spe_acc, s
The symptom is that if you segfault and then throw an exception in the
segfault handler call-saved fields in the Condition Register are
corrupted.
The reason is that the unwinder data for CR in the vDSO is wrong. The
line that affects the CR is here in
arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/sigtramp.S:
rs
