On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> You could "fix" this by walking all functions and check if only
>> one real language personality routine remains and promote
>> the generic C personality uses to that. Of course you need then
>> to be able to identify the C personality whic
> You could "fix" this by walking all functions and check if only
> one real language personality routine remains and promote
> the generic C personality uses to that. Of course you need then
> to be able to identify the C personality which you can't (well,
> you could by name).
Can't we simply r
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> When I run the test suite with Ada, I have two test suite failures,
>> for lto6.adb and lto8.adb. The failure mode is the same for both, see
>> end of this mail. Are these failures expected?
>
> That's an LTO bug: it can change the personali
> When I run the test suite with Ada, I have two test suite failures,
> for lto6.adb and lto8.adb. The failure mode is the same for both, see
> end of this mail. Are these failures expected?
That's an LTO bug: it can change the personality routine without any real
reasons. You don't need several
Steven Bosscher writes:
> Hi,
>
> When I run the test suite with Ada, I have two test suite failures,
> for lto6.adb and lto8.adb. The failure mode is the same for both, see
> end of this mail. Are these failures expected? This is on Debian Lenny
> x86_64.
See PR middle-end/44230 and this thread
Hi,
When I run the test suite with Ada, I have two test suite failures,
for lto6.adb and lto8.adb. The failure mode is the same for both, see
end of this mail. Are these failures expected? This is on Debian Lenny
x86_64.
Ciao!
Steven
In file included from :44:0:^M
/home/stevenb/devel/trunk/gcc/
