Re: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:01:37 +0300 (EEST) Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > Replying to myself, I was just informed (thanks hp!) that there is the > "URL" field in bugzilla, where the owner of the bug can add one relevant > URL. I tried it and it's very useful, it would be even better if I could >

Re: get email addr from username (was: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.)

On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 19:23 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Add @gcc.gnu.org to it? Unfortunately this is rarely in agreement with MAINTAINERS. For now I found it easier to just grep the Changelog file. Thanks, Dimitris

Re: get email addr from username (was: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.)

On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:24 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > Note that people that patched a file are not necessary maintainers of that > file. > Maintainers are listed exclusively in the MAINTAINERS file. I was just looking for a quick and easy hack for my own convenience, based on the logic tha

Re: get email addr from username (was: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.)

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Jul 16, 2012 5:28 PM, "Dimitrios Apostolou" wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to write a small script that shows emails addresses for all >> committers of last year, for all files a patch touches. In the commit logs >> however all c

Re: get email addr from username (was: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.)

On Jul 16, 2012 5:28 PM, "Dimitrios Apostolou" wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to write a small script that shows emails addresses for all > committers of last year, for all files a patch touches. In the commit logs > however all committers are referred to by username, and grepping the > MAINTA

get email addr from username (was: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.)

Hello, I'm trying to write a small script that shows emails addresses for all committers of last year, for all files a patch touches. In the commit logs however all committers are referred to by username, and grepping the MAINTAINERS files sometimes doesn't bring up any email address (e.g. gre

Re: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

> From: Dimitrios Apostolou > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:25:49 +0200 > Hi hp, thanks for the notes, I'm just going to highlight my point of view. > > Regarding patch pinging, my take is that is should be seldom necessary, > for example I tend to forget my small patches after sometime. Me too, s

Re: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

Does anyone have experience with Patchwork? It sounds like it works with a mailing list with less requirement for special markup than dannyb's tracker had. Jason

Re: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > On a whim I hosted a BOF at the GNU tools cauldron yesterday, > titled "pending patches" (no compliance with RFC5434 intended). Thanks for the notes. I want to add one point. There are a number of useful tools that we can imagine. How

Re: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: * Have a field in the bugzilla keeping "related ML threads" URLs. What I do now is post a separate comment saying "discussed here" or "posted patch here". Not sure if good enough, but on bugs I've not seen it in cases I needed to. Replying to m

Re: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

Hi hp, thanks for the notes, I'm just going to highlight my point of view. Regarding patch pinging, my take is that is should be seldom necessary, for example I tend to forget my small patches after sometime. So IMHO anyone replying anything is good, especially if he CCs the maintainer (Dodji-

Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.

On a whim I hosted a BOF at the GNU tools cauldron yesterday, titled "pending patches" (no compliance with RFC5434 intended). This was originally only out of egotistic motives: BUMPing the "Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure, revisited" patch at