de besides
> makes possibly debugging harder?
>
> Thanks/Fredrik
>
>
>
> From: Richard Biener [richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 09:28
> To: sa...@hederstierna.com
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: About loop unrolling
sibly debugging harder?
Thanks/Fredrik
From: Richard Biener [richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 09:28
To: sa...@hederstierna.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: About loop unrolling and optimize for size
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:26 PM, sa...@hederstierna.com
wrote:
> Hi
> I'm using an ARM thumb cross compiler for embedded systems and always do
> optimize for small size with -Os.
>
> Though I've experimented with optimization flags, and loop unrolling.
>
> Normally loop unrolling is always bad fo
Hi
I'm using an ARM thumb cross compiler for embedded systems and always do
optimize for small size with -Os.
Though I've experimented with optimization flags, and loop unrolling.
Normally loop unrolling is always bad for size, code is duplicated and size
increases.
Though I discovered that in
