Sorry, I miss. follow it:
2010/4/3 Tadashi Koike :
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm sorry to spend a week to response your replay, and thank you
> for explanation of -save-temps=obj specifications.
>
>> I tend to agree with Richard, that if there are multiple source inputs, it
>> should be an error to use -save
Hi Mike,
I'm sorry to spend a week to response your replay, and thank you
for explanation of -save-temps=obj specifications.
> I tend to agree with Richard, that if there are multiple source inputs, it
> should be an error to use -save-temps=obj without the -c/-S option.
I reached a true underst
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:33:17PM +0900, Tadashi Koike wrote:
> Hi Richard
> (* I am weak in English, so pleas forgive my English mistake.)
>
> Thank you for your reply, and I'm sorry to be late a reply.
>
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Tadashi Koike wrote:
> >> [ summary ]
> >> c
Hi Richard
(* I am weak in English, so pleas forgive my English mistake.)
Thank you for your reply, and I'm sorry to be late a reply.
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Tadashi Koike wrote:
>> [ summary ]
>> compiling is failed when more than two source file are
>>specified with both
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Tadashi Koike wrote:
> Hi all,
> (* I am weak in English, so pleas forgive my English mistake.)
>
> Please teach me about a behavior of -save-temps=obj option
> on gcc 4.5. A behavior I found is whether bug or specification ?
>
> [ summary ]
> compiling is
Hi all,
(* I am weak in English, so pleas forgive my English mistake.)
Please teach me about a behavior of -save-temps=obj option
on gcc 4.5. A behavior I found is whether bug or specification ?
[ summary ]
compiling is failed when more than two source file are
specified with both -
