> Did you test for large programs? Such as applications from SPEC 2006? or
> the equal size of programs. Thanks.
Oh no, we didnt. We stopped when we achieved fair stability purely on
the basis of
the number of testsuite failures ( less than 100).
cheers!
Pranav
> I am interesting in it. How about the current status, is it ongoing
> developing? Is it included in GCC official release?
Unfortunately our group is not actively working on that right now.
Because of some reasons
( mainly the paucity of time) we couldnt release it to the GCC
community then ( ab
On 06 Nov 2007 21:50:09 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Li Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wonder if any efforts have been made to retarget GCC to VLIW
> > backend.Is there any project trying to do that? Is it included in the
> > GCC mainstream? Thanks.
Dr. Baumgartl,
Li Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if any efforts have been made to retarget GCC to VLIW
> backend.Is there any project trying to do that? Is it included in the
> GCC mainstream? Thanks.
The FRV is an example of a currently supported VLIW backend.
Ian
Hi,
I know that. But I am talking to a more _pure_ VLIW architecture
which totally relies on static scheduling rather than EPIC architecture.
Thanks.
Li Wang wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if any efforts have been made to retarget GCC to VLIW
backend.Is there any project trying to do that? Is it incl
Li Wang wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if any efforts have been made to retarget GCC to VLIW
backend.Is there any project trying to do that? Is it included in the
GCC mainstream? Thanks.
the ia64 is a VLIW architecture!
Regards,
Li Wang
Hi,
I wonder if any efforts have been made to retarget GCC to VLIW
backend.Is there any project trying to do that? Is it included in the
GCC mainstream? Thanks.
Regards,
Li Wang
