Re: ACATS Results for powerpc-rtems on Trunk

2008-02-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
Duncan Sands wrote: Hi, 4.2.3 only failed c380004, c761007, and c953002. c380004 can be considered to be an expected failure. It also fails on x86-linux, and this is normal because the code produced by the front-end (gcc-4.2) can't possibly pass. Thanks. I did a lot of testing o

Re: ACATS Results for powerpc-rtems on Trunk

2008-02-09 Thread Duncan Sands
Hi, > 4.2.3 only failed c380004, c761007, and c953002. c380004 can be considered to be an expected failure. It also fails on x86-linux, and this is normal because the code produced by the front-end (gcc-4.2) can't possibly pass. Best wishes, Duncan.

ACATS Results for powerpc-rtems on Trunk

2008-02-08 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi, I wanted to post the Ada ACATS results for 4.2.3 and the SVN trunk for powerpc-rtems. 4.2.3: PASSED: 2309 FAILED3 Trunk: PASSED: 1623 FAILED 689 4.2.3 only failed c380004, c761007, and c953002. Obviously things are MUCH worse on the trunk. The last time I ran it on sparc-rtems, the re