Re: A silly question regarding function types

2020-09-04 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:39 AM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote: > > Note, isn't a problem, rather, it's something that puzzles me. > > On walking a function types argument types this way > > for ( arg = TYPE_ARG_TYPES ( func_type); >arg != NULL; >arg = TREE_CHAIN ( arg)) > { >

A silly question regarding function types

2020-09-03 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Note, isn't a problem, rather, it's something that puzzles me. On walking a function types argument types this way for ( arg = TYPE_ARG_TYPES ( func_type); arg != NULL; arg = TREE_CHAIN ( arg)) { . . } I noticed an extra void argument that didn't exist tagged