On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:39:55AM -0800, Chris wrote:
> Is it possible to have some sort of protocol in gcc, so that any
> unimplemented library function uses #warning or static_assert(0,"regex
> not implemented") to not to confuse any future users? I don't think
> gcc should provide headers tha
Hi,
I know that regex in c++0x was not implemented, but later I tried it
anyway and my code compiled but did not do a match. I looked at the
tr1_impl and the most functions have a \TODO implement and the function
just returns a default "do nothing".
Is it possible to have some sort of pro
