Laurent GUERBY wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
working on those FAIL?
Uros looked at this for me and thinks it might be due to
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 09:23 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
> >
> > I see lots
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
>
> I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
> working on those
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
>
> I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
> working on those FAIL?
>
> I collec
Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
working on those FAIL?
I collected on gcc-testresults quite good Ada res
Jakub Jelinek redhat.com> writes:
>
> GCC 4.3.0 release candidate 1 is now available at:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.0-RC-20080222/
>
> Please test the tarballs there and report any problems to Bugzilla. CC me
> on the bugs if you believe they are regressions from previous rel
Hello Ralf,
El Saturday 23 February 2008 08:33:34 Ralf Wildenhues escribió:
> Hello Guillermo,
>
> * Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:51:53PM CET:
> > El Friday 22 February 2008 20:21:36 Paweł Sikora escribió:
> > > as far i can see you're trying to build libgcj multilib
Hello Guillermo,
* Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:51:53PM CET:
> El Friday 22 February 2008 20:21:36 Paweł Sikora escribió:
> >
> > as far i can see you're trying to build libgcj multilib (32/64-bits)
> > on x86_64 only enviroment. please try --disable-libjava-multilib
El Friday 22 February 2008 20:21:36 Paweł Sikora escribió:
> On Friday 22 of February 2008 21:08:10 Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> > ../../../native/jni/classpath/.libs/jcl.o -ljack -m32 -m32 -m32
> > -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgjsmdssi.so -o .libs/libgjsmdssi.so
> > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux
On Friday 22 of February 2008 21:08:10 Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> ../../../native/jni/classpath/.libs/jcl.o -ljack -m32 -m32 -m32
> -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgjsmdssi.so -o .libs/libgjsmdssi.so
> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.2.1/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld
>: skipping incompatib
Hello,
El Friday 22 February 2008 14:41:30 Jakub Jelinek escribió:
> GCC 4.3.0 release candidate 1 is now available at:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.0-RC-20080222/
>
> Please test the tarballs there and report any problems to Bugzilla. CC me
> on the bugs if you believe they are re
GCC 4.3.0 release candidate 1 is now available at:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.0-RC-20080222/
Please test the tarballs there and report any problems to Bugzilla. CC me
on the bugs if you believe they are regressions from previous releases
severe enough that they should block the 4.3.
12 matches
Mail list logo