On 7/31/07 6:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> There are also few other occurences in cgraph.c and ipa-inline. Those
> are used to test whether function body is present. When you have body
> elsewhere now, you can check something else (such as
> DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION(cfun)->cfg)
Currently, in tuples,
> > The test there is sort of hack, I would just remove it at this stage and
> > we can work out better fix for that testcase later. I hope that with my
> > plans for declaration merging pass we can get round such weird side
> > effects of in place declaration replacement.
>
> Will do.
>
> How a
> The test there is sort of hack, I would just remove it at this stage and
> we can work out better fix for that testcase later. I hope that with my
> plans for declaration merging pass we can get round such weird side
> effects of in place declaration replacement.
Will do.
How about all the oth
> Hi Jan.
>
> What do you expect DECL_SAVED_TREE to have in cgraph_analyze_functions:
>
> /* ??? It is possible to create extern inline function and later using
>weak alias attribute to kill its body. See
>gcc.c-torture/compile/2009-1.c */
> if (!DECL_SAVED_TREE (
Hi Jan.
What do you expect DECL_SAVED_TREE to have in cgraph_analyze_functions:
/* ??? It is possible to create extern inline function and later using
weak alias attribute to kill its body. See
gcc.c-torture/compile/2009-1.c */
if (!DECL_SAVED_TREE (decl))
